Polycarboxylic acids as crosslinking agents for grafting cyclodextrins onto cotton and wool fabrics: Study of the process parameters
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract In this paper we describe a new method for the grafting of cyclodextrins (CDs)onto cotton or wool fabrics. The novelty principally concerns the chemical approach of the grafting reaction that was carried out in the presence of polycarboxylic acids, such as 1,2,3,4‐butanetetracarboxylic acid, citric acid, or polyacrylic acid. All types of native or CD derivatives could be used successfully as long as they carried enough remaining hydroxyl groups. For example, the amount of native β‐CD fixed onto the fabrics increased up to 12% in weight, whereas this value decreased to only 3% for the randomly methylated derivative of β‐CD (RAMEB). We observed that phosphorous salts, such as sodium mono‐ and dihydrogen phosphate or sodium dihydrogen hypophosphite, catalyzed the reaction. On the other hand, the conventional and convenient pad–dry–cure technique that is currently used at the industrial scale in textile processing was applied. We report that the polycarboxylic acids play the role of linking agent through an esterification (or amidification) reaction with the OH (or NH 2 ) groups of both CD and cotton (or wool) fibers. In addition, this reaction could lead to the graft of a copolymer formed between CD and the polycarboxylic acid. The reaction yield depends on the concentration and nature of the aforementioned reactants and catalysts and on the curing conditions (time and temperature). © 2002 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 83: 1449–1456, 2002
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it