MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Involvement of Caspase-6 and Caspase-8 in Neuronal Apoptosis and the Regenerative Failure of Injured Retinal Ganglion Cells

2011· article· en· W2036838549 on OpenAlexafffund
Philippe P. Monnier, Philippe M. D’Onofrio, Mark Magharious, Adam C. Hollander, Nardos G. Tassew, Kinga Szydłowska, Michael Tymianski, Paulo D. Koeberle

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Neuroscience · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicNerve injury and regeneration
Canadian institutionsToronto Western HospitalUniversity of Toronto
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchHeart and Stroke Foundation of Canada
KeywordsCell biologyRetinal ganglion cellRegeneration (biology)BiologyNeuriteCaspase 3RetinaCaspaseApoptosisNeuroprotectionMuller gliaCaspase 2NeuroscienceProgrammed cell deathStem cellProgenitor cellIn vitroBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

To promote functional recovery after CNS injuries, it is crucial to develop strategies that enhance both neuronal survival and regeneration. Here, we report that caspase-6 is upregulated in injured retinal ganglion cells and that its inhibition promotes both survival and regeneration in these adult CNS neurons. Treatment of rat retinal whole mounts with Z-VEID-FMK, a selective inhibitor of caspase-6, enhanced ganglion cell survival. Moreover, retinal explants treated with this drug extended neurites on myelin. We also show that caspase-6 inhibition resulted in improved ganglion cell survival and robust axonal regeneration following optic nerve injury in adult rats. The effects of Z-VEID-FMK were similar to other caspase inhibitory peptides including Z-LEHD-FMK and Z-VAD-FMK. In searching for downstream effectors for caspase-6, we identified caspase-8, whose expression pattern resembled that of caspase-6 in the injured eye. We then showed that caspase-8 is activated downstream of caspase-6 in the injured adult retina. Furthermore, we investigated the role of caspase-8 in RGC apoptosis and regenerative failure both in vitro and in vivo. We observed that caspase-8 inhibition by Z-IETD-FMK promoted survival and regeneration to an extent similar to that obtained with caspase-6 inhibition. Our results indicate that caspase-6 and caspase-8 are components of a cellular pathway that prevents neuronal survival and regeneration in the adult mammalian CNS.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.043
GPT teacher head0.253
Teacher spread0.209 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations103
Published2011
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of NeuroscienceSame topicNerve injury and regenerationFrench-language works237,207