MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2036865264 · doi:10.2113/econgeo.107.3.385

Formation and Evolution of the Centennial Unconformity-Related Uranium Deposit in the South-Central Athabasca Basin, Canada

2012· article· en· W2036865264 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Paul Alexandre, Kurt Kyser, Dan Jiricka, G. Witt

Bibliographic record

VenueEconomic Geology · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological and Geochemical Analysis
Canadian institutionsCameco (Canada)Queen's University
FundersUniversity of Manitoba
KeywordsUnconformityUranium oreGeologyCentennialGeochemistryStructural basinUraniumArchaeologyPaleontologyGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Centennial U deposit is situated in the south-central Athabasca Basin (Canada) and straddles the unconformity between early Paleoproterozoic to Archean metasedimentary and metavolcanic rocks and granitoids, and the clastic sediments of the Paleoproterozoic Athabasca Group. Although it has most characteristics of an unconformity-related uranium deposit, the Centennial deposit is atypical in that it is not directly associated with an electromagnetic conductor (there is a paucity of graphite in the basement) or with a major reverse fault zone; it is distal from a major fluid conduit (ca. 300 to 400 m from the Dufferin Lake Fault), has low Ni, Cu, Co, Zn, and Pb contents, and contains an unusually large amount (up to 5%) of secondary uranyl minerals. Additionally, a network of diabase dikes and sills is observed at Centennial, seemingly intruding the main U mineralization of massive uraninite, based on the relatively sharp contacts between the diabase dike and the high-grade U mineralization. The pre-U alteration assemblage at Centennial includes kaolinite, illite, and sudoite, which have been formed by fluids with isotopic and chemical compositions that are comparable with those from other sandstone-hosted unconformity-type U deposits in the Athabasca Basin. Pre-U illite-related fluids have δ 18O of ca. 3‰ and δ D of ca. −40‰, whereas pre-U chlorite-related fluids have δ 18O between 1.7 and 4.3‰ and δ D between −18 and 1‰. Laser ablation-inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry (LA-ICP-MS) U/Pb dating of the various U phases indicates that initial mineralization, represented by disseminated uraninite found directly to the north-northeast of the Centennial deposit, occurred at ca. 1.6 Ga. The main U mineralization, represented by massive and strongly altered uraninite, followed at an unknown time. A minor (<5%) unaltered uraninite formed from the local remobilization of the main massive uraninite at ca. 380 Ma. The main uranyl mineral, uranophane, formed last, at ca. 2 Ma. The recurrence of local U remobilization might have been facilitated by the persisting high permeability of the sandstones in the area due to the nearby Dufferin Lake Fault and to the emplacement of the diabase dikes. The usefulness of Pb isotopes for exploration is demonstrated at the Centennial deposit, with strongly radiogenic Pb isotope signatures close to the deposit and a common Pb signature observed at a distance of a few km from the deposit.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.141
Threshold uncertainty score0.867

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.145
Teacher spread0.141 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations41
Published2012
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEconomic GeologySame topicGeological and Geochemical AnalysisFrench-language works237,207