Metal Chalcogenide Clusters on the Border between Molecules and Materials
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract The preparative and materials chemistry of high nuclearity transition metal chalcogenide nanoclusters has been in the focus of our research for many years. These polynuclear metal compounds possess rich photophysical properties and can be understood as intermediates between mononuclear complexes and binary bulk phases. Based on our previous results we discuss herein recent advances in three different areas of cluster research. In the field of copper selenide clusters we present the synthesis of monodisperse, nanostructured α ‐Cu 2 Se via the thermolysis of well‐defined cluster compounds as well as our approaches in the synthesis of functionalized clusters. In case of silver chalcogenides we established a strategy to synthesis cluster compounds containing several hundreds of silver atoms with the nanoclusters arranging in a closely packed crystal lattice. Finally the presented chalcogenide clusters of the group 12 metals (Zn, Cd, Hg) can be taken as model compounds for corresponding nanoparticles as even the smallest of frameworks display a clear structural relationship to the bulk materials.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it