MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2036977622 · doi:10.1021/bm7007907

Bioactive Microarrays Immobilized on Low-Fouling Surfaces to Study Specific Endothelial Cell Adhesion

2007· article· en· W2036977622 on OpenAlexaff
Emmanuelle Monchaux, Patrick Vermette

Bibliographic record

VenueBiomacromolecules · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
Topic3D Printing in Biomedical Research
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Sherbrooke
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEndothelial stem cellChemistryCell adhesionAdhesionCellCell adhesion moleculeCell biologyBiophysicsBiochemistryIn vitroBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

With the aim to study how to modulate the specific endothelial cell patterning and responses on biomaterials surfaces, bioactive microarrays were developed and validated for specific cell patterning. These microarrays were made of low-fouling surfaces, that prevent nonspecific cell adhesion, bearing bioactive molecules at given known locations by presenting specific ligands to cell receptors. Arrays of bioactive molecules (RGD, REDV, and SVVYGLR sequences and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)) were immobilized on a carboxy-methyl-dextran low-fouling surface and were exposed to human endothelial cells and fibroblasts to screen for the effect of bioactive spot molecular composition on cell adhesion. Endothelial cells only were sensitive to RGD peptide co-immobilized with REDV or SVVYGLR sequences: they induced a reduction in cell spreading and a loss of actin stress fibers. RGD co-immobilized with VEGF also resulted in the reorganization of actin filaments and focal points in endothelial cells. Combination of RGD with these endothelial cell-selective biomolecules did not elicit a strong adhesion phenotype but rather one characteristic of migrating cells.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.275
Teacher spread0.259 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations48
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBiomacromoleculesSame topic3D Printing in Biomedical ResearchFrench-language works237,207