Bibliographic record
Abstract
C JHP – Vol. 63, No. 1 – January–February 2010 JCPH – Vol. 63, n 1 – janvier–fevrier 2010 Statement (the last 2 documents in collaboration with the Pharmacist Prescribing Task Force). A most prolific year! After several years of hard work, the Association des pharmaciens des etablissements de sante du Quebec and CSHP were glowing with excitement when they launched the fourth edition of Care Beyond Cure, in both French and English versions (http:// www.cshp.ca/productsServices/otherPublications/careBeyondCure_ e.asp). This valued guide and its companion pocket book provide up-to-date information about the management of pain and other symptoms for the benefit of patients receiving palliative care. In 2008 the CSHP Board of Fellows lit candles to celebrate its 40th anniversary and drafted a historical memento to recognize this significant milestone. CSHP initiated the Fellows program in 1968 to recognize CSHP members who had demonstrated outstanding leadership, dedication, and commitment to practice excellence and growth. This designation rewards the long-term, sustained effort of members in the areas of service to the Society, to patient care, to education or research, and to the practice of hospital pharmacy. The memento was initially circulated to those Fellows present at the 2008 Professional Practice Conference and was subsequently sent by e-mail to all Fellows. It was later translated into French, and in 2009, professionally designed versions were shared electronically with the entire membership (http://www.cshp.ca/programs/ fellows/anniversary_e.asp). The Ontario Medical Association (OMA) sparked controversy within the health care community last fall with its national media campaign against pharmacists’ expanding scope of practice. CSHP and its Ontario Branch responded to the inflammatory messages in a letter to the OMA, with copies to the Ontario Pharmacists’ Association and the Ontario Hospital Association, urging the OMA to live up to the statement it made to the Ontario Legislative Standing Committee on Social Policy on September 29, 2009, that “collaboration between EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR’S REPORT
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.017 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.012 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.013 | 0.012 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.010 |
| Research integrity | 0.006 | 0.012 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.236 | 0.120 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".