MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2037154685 · doi:10.1002/jcp.22441

Nestin<sup>(+)</sup> stem cells independently contribute to neural remodelling of the ischemic heart

2010· article· en· W2037154685 on OpenAlexafffund
Pauline Béguin, Viviane El‐Helou, Marc‐Antoine Gillis, Natacha Duquette, Hugues Gosselin, Ramón Brugada, Louis Villeneuve, Dominique Lauzier, Jean‐François Tanguay, Christophe Ribuot, Angelino Calderone

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Cellular Physiology · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiac Fibrosis and Remodeling
Canadian institutionsUniversité de MontréalMontreal Heart Institute
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsNestinNeurofilamentPathologyBiologyTransplantationPopulationStem cellAnatomyNeural stem cellMedicineNeuroscienceCell biologyInternal medicineImmunohistochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Recent studies have revealed the existence of multipotent nestin-immunoreactive cells in the adult mammalian heart. These cells were recruited to infarct site following ischemic injury and differentiated to a vascular lineage leading to de novo blood vessel formation. Here, we show that a sub-population of cardiac resident nestin((+)) cells can further differentiate to a neuronal-like fate in vivo following myocardial infarction. In the ischemically damaged rat heart, neurofilament-M((+)) fibres were detected innervating the peri-infarct/infarct region and the preponderance of these fibres were physically associated with processes emanating from nestin((+)) cells. One week after isogenic heterotopic cardiac transplantation, the beating transplanted rat heart was devoid of neurofilament-M((+)) fibre staining. The superimposition of an ischemic insult to the transplanted heart led to the de novo synthesis of neurofilament-M((+)) fibres by cardiac resident nestin((+)) cells. Nerve growth factor infusion and the exposure of normal rats to intermittent hypoxia significantly increased the density of neurofilament-M((+)) fibres in the heart. However, these newly formed neurofilament-M((+)) fibres were not physically associated with nestin((+)) processes. These data highlight a novel paradigm of reparative fibrosis as a subpopulation of cardiac resident nestin((+)) cells directly contributed to neural remodelling of the peri-infarct/infarct region of the ischemically damaged rat heart via the de novo synthesis of neurofilament-M fibres.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.015
Threshold uncertainty score0.450

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.240
Teacher spread0.227 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations14
Published2010
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Cellular PhysiologySame topicCardiac Fibrosis and RemodelingFrench-language works237,207