MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2037168660 · doi:10.4319/lom.2006.4.406

A system to quantitatively recover bacterioplankton respiratory CO<sub>2</sub>for isotopic analysis to trace sources and ages of organic matter consumed in freshwaters

2006· article· en· W2037168660 on OpenAlexaff
S. Leigh McCallister, François Guillemette, Paul A. del Giorgio

Bibliographic record

VenueLimnology and Oceanography Methods · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicMarine and coastal ecosystems
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à Montréal
FundersLawrence Livermore National Laboratory
KeywordsEnvironmental chemistryBacterioplanktonChemistryDissolved organic carbonCarbonateOrganic matterIncubationCarbon fibersTotal inorganic carbonCarbon dioxidePhytoplanktonNutrient

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We present a new system and method to measure the natural abundance isotopic (δ13C, Δ14C) values of respiratory CO2 produced by bacterioplankton, to directly assess the sources and ages of organic carbon (OC) respired by bacteria in aquatic ecosystems. The Respiratory Carbon Recovery System (ReCReS) and operating procedure were designed to reduce background dissolved inorganic carbon values by > 98% and then quantitatively recover the CO2 derived from bacterial respiration after incubation of freshwater samples. The 2-component ReCReS consists of an airtight incubation system (20 L), for short-term regrowth incubations of filtered water samples inoculated with ambient bacteria, and a harvest system to recover the respiratory CO2 produced during these incubations. The multistep operating procedure involves the following: (1) filling of incubation system with 0.2-µm filtered sample water; (2) addition of 1 N HCl (pH to ~2.8); (3) sparge with ultrahigh-purity (UHP) He to remove dissolved inorganic carbon; (4) sparge with UHP, volatile organic carbon-, CO2-free air to replenish oxygen; (5) neutralization (1 N carbonate free NaOH), reinoculation with the ambient bacterial assemblage, and incubation (80-132 h); (6) acidification to pH 2.8; and (7) UHP He sparge for > 12 h. The evolved CO2 is sent through 2 water traps (dry ice slurries) before cryogenic trapping in liquid N2. Control incubations were processed concurrently to evaluate extraction efficiencies, potential methodological contamination, and fractionation artifacts. Collectively, our results suggest that respiratory CO2 is quantitatively recovered and the isotopic fidelity (δ13C, Δ14C) between the OC respired and the CO2 harvested is retained. Moreover, the system allows the recovery of sufficient C to measure both δ13C and Δ14C values, even in the most oligotrophic systems.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.016
Threshold uncertainty score0.920

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.259
Teacher spread0.245 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations19
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLimnology and Oceanography MethodsSame topicMarine and coastal ecosystemsFrench-language works237,207