MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Report of an Anaphylactoid and an Anaphylactic Reaction to Ketorolac in Two Pediatric Surgical Patients

2006· article· en· W2037186862 on OpenAlexaff
Carlos Castillo‐Zamora, Luz Antonia Castillo‐Peralta, Alejandro A. Nava‐Ocampo

Bibliographic record

VenueTherapeutic Drug Monitoring · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPharmaceutical studies and practices
Canadian institutionsHospital for Sick Children
Fundersnot available
KeywordsKetorolacMedicineAnesthesiaAdverse effectAnaphylaxisErythemaAnalgesicOrthopedic surgerySurgeryInternal medicineAllergy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Ketorolac is a potent analgesic drug that has been restricted in dosage and use because of its potential adverse effects. The diagnostic and ethical challenges of 2 children who had unpredictable adverse drug reactions to ketorolac are reported. Case 1: A 3-year-old boy received ketorolac 1 mg/kg for prevention of postoperative pain at the end of an orthopedic surgical procedure. Ten minutes later, he had bilateral palpebral edema, erythema in thorax, hypotension, and tachycardia. The adverse event was classified as a mixed reaction probably related to ketorolac. Case 2: A 7-year-old girl, who had previously received ketorolac in 2 different surgical procedures, underwent a third orthopedic surgery. She received ketorolac 1 mg/kg as pre-emptive analgesia at 1.5 hours of anesthetic time (approximately 1 hour of surgical time). The patient developed palpebral edema 5 minutes later in addition to erythema in thorax, hypotension, tachycardia, tachypnea, oxygen desaturation, and wheezing. The adverse event was classified as a systemic reaction probably related to ketorolac. The 2 patients were successfully treated with symptomatic therapy. Although rare in its frequency, ketorolac administration may be associated to anaphylactic and anaphylactoid reactions in children with or without history of previous exposure. Because ketorolac is off-licensed for pediatric patients, it should be administered only after the risks and benefits have been discussed with the child's parents in the preanesthetic consultation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.031
Threshold uncertainty score0.599

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.382
Teacher spread0.350 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTherapeutic Drug MonitoringSame topicPharmaceutical studies and practicesFrench-language works237,207