Delay in Sexual Maturity of the Follicle-Stimulating Hormone Receptor Knockout Male Mouse1
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In the highly organized and complex process of mammalian spermatogenesis, the development of an undifferentiated diploid germ cell into a fully differentiated and mature spermatozoon is orchestrated in a time frame unique for each species including man. If the various hormonal signals including environmental cues that play a critical part in initiating these events are not properly executed, various deficiencies including delay in sexual maturity or puberty are likely. In this study we have followed testicular development and spermatogenesis in the FSH receptor knockout (FORKO) mice from Day 7 onward by using histology and quantitative DNA flow cytometry. The drastic reduction in testicular weight and shrinkage of seminiferous tubules that occurred at this early age persisted into the adult stage in the FORKOs, suggesting inhibition of the initial developmental processes. The round spermatids that were clearly abundant on Day 21 in the wild-type and heterozygous males were few and present only in some tubules of the FORKOs. There were no elongated spermatids in FORKO males on Day 35. The sperm produced by Day 49 FORKOs were already aberrant, a feature that persisted into adulthood in these animals. As all these changes occurred in a background of normal circulating testosterone levels, we may conclude that the delay in testicular development is a consequence of the loss of FSH-receptor signaling. The delay in sexual maturity of FORKOs was accompanied by reduction in fertility as evidenced by mating studies. Based on these data we suggest that the FORKO mouse might be a useful experimental model to define the molecular mechanisms that underlie the delay in puberty.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".