On micronekton and ichthyoplankton of the frontal zone of the gulf stream and subpolar waters (Polygone “Titanic”)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Results of studies of the species composition of micronektonic fish and ichthyoplankton in the frontal zone of the Gulf Stream and subpolar waters at the stationary polygone “Titanic” performed in years with different hydrological situations (2000 and 2003) are provided. In July through August of 2000 during the penetration in the polygone of warm waters of the Gulf Stream, a considerable (almost by an order of magnitude) increase in the species composition of fish due to numerous tropical and subtropical species was recorded in comparison with the period of studies in 2003, close by dates, when the region was occupied by the cold waters of the Labrador Current. In the summer of 2000, of the 80 taxonomic forms found on the polygone, 48 were represented only by larval stages of development; 27, only by juvenile and adult specimens; and 5, by both larvae and juvenile and adult specimens. The last five species include Ceratoscopelus maderensis and Lampanyctus pusillus (Myctophidae), Arctozenus risso (Paralepididae), Stomias boa (Stomiidae), and Gonostoma elongatum (Gonostomatidae). In the summer of 2003, larval fish were absent in collections, and only juvenile and adult specimens of eight species from ten families were found. The bulk of the population of micronektonic fish in this period, as in the summer of 2000, was formed by the same arcto-boreal species of myctophids Benthosema glaciale .
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".