MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2037230875 · doi:10.2310/7750.2011.10046

Unusual Case of Proximal Calciphylaxis without Renal Failure

2011· article· en· W2037230875 on OpenAlexaff
Monica Stanciu, Angélique Gagné-Henley, Geneviève Thérien

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Cutaneous Medicine and Surgery · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicParathyroid Disorders and Treatments
Canadian institutionsHôpital de l'Enfant-Jésus
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCalciphylaxisMedicineChronic renal failureSodium thiosulfateComplicationDialysisSurgeryHemodialysisKidney diseaseCalcificationInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Calciphylaxis is a rare syndrome of vascular calcification with subsequent cutaneous and tissue necrosis. It usually manifests as a complication of end-stage renal failure, affecting 1 to 4% of long-term dialysis patients. Very exceptionally, it can occur without chronic renal failure. OBJECTIVE: The goal of this study was to discuss an exceptional case of extensive calciphylaxis in the absence of chronic renal failure and its successful management. METHODS: We present a case of a 31-year-old woman with extensive proximal, ulcerated calciphylaxis without associated chronic renal failure. Our patient had quite a few risk factors associated with the pathogenesis of calciphylaxis, such as obesity, malnutrition, and a transient episode of acute renal failure. RESULTS: She was successfully treated with sodium thiosulfate, extensive wound débridement (more than 30% total body surface), and subsequent skin grafts. The patient has miraculously survived this often fatal condition. CONCLUSION: Calciphylaxis can occur even in the absence of chronic renal failure. This often fatal condition can be managed successfully with a combination of aggressive wound control and the fairly newly described sodium thiosulfate therapy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.017

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0030.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.045
GPT teacher head0.295
Teacher spread0.250 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Cutaneous Medicine and SurgerySame topicParathyroid Disorders and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207