MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2037255377 · doi:10.1097/brs.0b013e31824ee1c2

Neurological and Survival Outcomes After Surgical Management of Subaxial Cervical Spine Metastases

2012· article· en· W2037255377 on OpenAlexaff
Wonik Cho, Ung‐Kyu Chang

Bibliographic record

VenueSpine · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicManagement of metastatic bone disease
Canadian institutionsObject Research Systems (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineSurgeryMetastasisSpinal cord compressionMagnetic resonance imagingRetrospective cohort studyIncidence (geometry)Adjuvant therapySpinal cordRadiologyInternal medicineChemotherapyCancer

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

STUDY DESIGN: A clinical retrospective study. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the clinical outcomes of surgery for cervical spine metastasis and identify factors affecting survival and neurological result. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Metastatic disease in the cervical spine is known to be a poorer prognosis than in thoracic and lumbar regions. Few reports focused on cervical spine metastasis are available. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of medical records and radiological data was performed on 46 patients who underwent surgical treatment due to cervical spine metastasis from 2000 to 2010. The incidence of cervical metastasis, overall survival, progression-free survival, and neurological and pain outcomes were analyzed. In addition, factors affecting survival, local recurrence, and neurological and pain outcomes among the 46 study subjects were analyzed. These factors included; age, sex, primary tumor growth rate, preoperative disease-progression status (expressed with Tomita score), irradiation, timing of irradiation, postoperative adjuvant therapy, time of diagnosis of spinal metastasis, cord compression or foraminal invasion on magnetic resonance image, preoperative neurological status, and preoperative pain level. RESULTS: The incidence of cervical metastasis was 17.3%. Mean postoperative overall survival was 16.89 months, the recurrence rate was 39.1%, and mean progression free survival was 11.82 months. Factors related to prolonged survival were slow primary tumor growth, low Tomita score, irradiation of the lesion, and postoperative adjuvant therapy. Postoperative adjuvant therapy was also found to be effective for preventing recurrence. Patients with high preoperative Japanese Orthopaedic Association Score achieved better neurological outcomes. Foraminal invasion was found to be negatively correlated with postoperative pain outcome. CONCLUSION: Surgical management for subaxial cervical spinal metastasis was found to be effective in terms of neurological recovery and pain control. Furthermore, surgical treatment plus adjuvant therapy was found to achieve sufficient local control during postoperative follow-up.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.020
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.304
Teacher spread0.280 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations49
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSpineSame topicManagement of metastatic bone diseaseFrench-language works237,207