MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Operational Use of RADARSAT SAR Data as Aid to Winter Navigation in the Baltic Sea

2000· article· en· W2037259265 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Jouni Vainio, M. Similä, Hannu Grönvall

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Remote Sensing · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicArctic and Antarctic ice dynamics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeographyForestryCartographyHumanitiesArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

RÉSUMÉLe Service des glaces de l'Institut finlandais de recherche marine a utilisé des données RADARSAT dans ses opérations de routine au cours de l'hiver 1997/98. Plus de cent scènes en faisceau étroit ScanSAR ont été acquises conjointement par les Services finlandais et suédois des glaces et des services de gestion opérationnelle de brises glaces. Les scènes ont été reçues par la Station satellitaire de Tromsø, en Norvège, et relayées au Service des glaces par transmission ftp dans un délai de deux heures. La première scène a été reçue le 8 février. Les scènes ont été corrigées et utilisées par le Service des glaces dans ses routines quotidiennes de même que pour le développement d'un algorithme de classification automatisé. Un certain nombre de scènes ont été compressées et transférées aux brises glaces et, à titre expérimental, à deux navires marchands en route pour Saint-Pétersbourg, en Russie. Les scènes ont été jugées très utiles à la fois par le Service des glaces et par les autres utilisateurs.SUMMARYThe Ice Service of the Finnish Institute of Marine Research made use of RADARSAT data in its operational routines in the winter of 1997/98. A total of one hundred screens of ScanSAR narrow data was bought jointly by the Finnish and Swedish Ice Services and icebreaker operational managements. The screens were received by the Tromsø Satellite Station, Norway, and retrieved by the Ice Service as an ftp-transmission two hours later. The first screen was received on February 8th. The screens were corrected and used by the Ice Service in its daily routines as well as in the development of an automated classification algorithm. A selection of screens was compressed and transferred to the icebreakers and, by way of test, to two merchant ships engaged on voyages to St. Petersburg, Russia. The screens were regarded as highly useful both by the Ice Service and by the other end-users. Additional informationNotes on contributorsJ. Vainio• Jouni Vainio, Markku Similä and Hannu Grönvall are with the Finnish Institute of Marine Research, P.O. Box 33, FIN-00931 Helsinki, FINLAND, Phone: +358-9-613941, Fax: +358-9-6139-4494 E-mail: jouni.vainio@fimr.fi, markku.simila@fimr.fi, hannu.gronvall@fimr.fiM. Similä• Jouni Vainio, Markku Similä and Hannu Grönvall are with the Finnish Institute of Marine Research, P.O. Box 33, FIN-00931 Helsinki, FINLAND, Phone: +358-9-613941, Fax: +358-9-6139-4494 E-mail: jouni.vainio@fimr.fi, markku.simila@fimr.fi, hannu.gronvall@fimr.fiH. Grönvall• Jouni Vainio, Markku Similä and Hannu Grönvall are with the Finnish Institute of Marine Research, P.O. Box 33, FIN-00931 Helsinki, FINLAND, Phone: +358-9-613941, Fax: +358-9-6139-4494 E-mail: jouni.vainio@fimr.fi, markku.simila@fimr.fi, hannu.gronvall@fimr.fi

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.944
Threshold uncertainty score0.894

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.234
Teacher spread0.205 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Remote SensingSame topicArctic and Antarctic ice dynamicsFrench-language works237,207