MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2037262765 · doi:10.1063/1.4769935

MatMRI and MatHIFU: Matlab{trade mark, serif} toolboxes for real-time monitoring and control of MR-HIFU

2012· article· en· W2037262765 on OpenAlexaffabout
Tony Sinclair, Charles Mougenot, Jon Kivinen, Samuel Pichardo

Bibliographic record

VenueAIP conference proceedings · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicUltrasound and Hyperthermia Applications
Canadian institutionsLakehead UniversityPhilips (Canada)CARE CanadaThunder Bay Regional Research Institute
FundersUniversité de Bordeaux
KeywordsComputer scienceToolboxData acquisitionProtocol (science)ScannerSoftwareCommunications protocolReal-time computingMATLABComputer hardwareEmbedded systemArtificial intelligenceOperating system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background. Availability of open tools is a key feature to facilitate the development of pre-clinical research of Magnetic Resonance-guided High Intensity Focused Ultrasound (MR-HIFU). MatMRI is a toolbox that allows direct communication with a Philips{trade mark, serif} MRI scanner in a Matlab{trade mark, serif} environment, which is well-known in many laboratories. MatMRI performs real-time acquisition of magnitude and phase images that can be processed to estimate changes of temperature. Available functionality of MatMRI includes acquisition of individual slices and volumetric data. Analogously to MatMRI, MatHIFU is a toolbox for the control of the Philips Sonalleve MR-HIFU system. MatHIFU allows the execution of user-defined treatment protocols such as thermal ablation, hyperthermia or drug delivery. MatMRI and MatHIFU can be used independently or in combination. Methods. MatMRI was based on the official tool for MRI data-dumping made by Philips Healthcare. Multi-threading capabilities were added to maximize real-time processing performance. Basic use of MatMRI involves four basic steps: initiate communication, subscribe to MRI data, query for new images and unsubscribe. If required, MatMRI can also pause/resume the scanning and update on real-time the location and orientation of the images. MatHIFU performs the execution of sonication protocols and allows real-time monitoring. Basic use of MatHIFU requires also four steps: preparation of sonication protocol, initiate communication, execute sonication protocol and monitor the state of execution. Results. MatMRI was integrated into existing software used to control a table designed for animal experimentation (FUS Instruments, Canada). The integration in the existing software was seamless and delivered real-time estimation of changes of temperature in a mouse model. Using MatHIFU and MatMRI, a complete new interface to control the Sonalleve system was developed to perform in vivo experiments allowing adapted conditions for the experimental model. Conclusions. MatMRI and MatHIFU leverage considerably the existing MRI and MR-HIFU platforms to conduct pre-clinical research. MatMRI simplifies considerably the efforts required to perform real-time measurements of MR data and its possibilities are beyond thermal applications. MatHIFU facilitates the exploration of new therapeutic applications using the Philips MR-HIFU Sonalleve system. Both matMRI and matHIFU are aimed to be freely available to other research groups under coordination of Philips Healthcare.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.647
Threshold uncertainty score0.632

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.221
Teacher spread0.208 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2012
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAIP conference proceedingsSame topicUltrasound and Hyperthermia ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207