Magnetic Resonance Evolution of De Novo Formation of a Cavernoma in a Thrombosed Developmental Venous Anomaly
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND IMPORTANCE: Mechanisms that lead to de novo formations of nonfamilial-type cavernomas are not well understood. One of the interesting hypotheses is the causative relationship between developmental venous anomaly (DVA) and cavernoma formation. We report a unique case in which serial imaging demonstrated the evolution of de novo formation of a cavernoma in association with a thrombosed DVA. A detailed review of the causal hypothesis between a DVA and cavernoma is also provided. CLINICAL PRESENTATION: We report a 37-year-old female patient in whom a cavernoma-like lesion arose 1 year after the progressive thrombosis of a medullary (or caput medusa) vein of a DVA. The presence of an acute angulation in the draining vein may have prompted an intrinsic outflow restriction. Possible worsening of venous disequilibrium led to subsequent thrombus progression, venous congestion, and occlusion of the vein with venous dilation and signs of stasis on follow-up magnetic resonance imaging. Finally, this developed into a lobulated lesion with salt-and-pepper appearance at the converging region of medullary tributaries, which typified the classic features of a cavernoma. CONCLUSION: Compared with other published cases of de novo cavernoma formation in relation to a DVA, our case, for the first time, allows us to witness the temporal evolution from a thrombosed DVA to the birth of a cavernoma around it. This supports the hypothesis that the cavernoma can be an acquired disease that arises from a DVA.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".