MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2037352907 · doi:10.1577/t05-012.1

Comparison of Larval Sea Lamprey Life History Characteristics in a Lampricide‐Treated Tributary and Untreated Tributary System of Lake Champlain

2006· article· en· W2037352907 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Adam Zerrenner, J. Ellen Marsden

Bibliographic record

VenueTransactions of the American Fisheries Society · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicFish Ecology and Management Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersOffice of Experimental Program to Stimulate Competitive ResearchCalifornia Department of Fish and WildlifeU.S. Fish and Wildlife ServiceGreat Lakes Fishery CommissionNew York State Department of Environmental Conservation
KeywordsTributaryPikeLampreyPetromyzonElectrofishingSTREAMSLarvaFisheryEnvironmental scienceHabitatEcologyBiologyGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Control of sea lampreys Petromyzon marinus in Lake Champlain and the Laurentian Great Lakes is dependent primarily on selective lampricides that reduce the density of sea lamprey larvae in tributary streams. After lampricide treatment, recolonized larval sea lampreys may experience enhanced growth from density‐dependent factors, which may lead to transformation at a larger size and younger age than would have occurred before treatment. In this study, the effects of lampricide treatments on larval sea lamprey life history characteristics were compared between Lewis Creek (Vermont), a treated stream, at 4–5 years posttreatment and the untreated Pike River–Morpion Stream system (Quebec, Canada). Sea lamprey habitat was measured in each stream at approximately 100 randomly selected transects, and larval density was determined using a backpack electrofishing unit during 1999 and 2000. Larval sea lamprey density was approximately threefold higher in Lewis Creek than in the Pike River and Morpion Stream in both years. Growth measured in length and weight indicated that neither treatment nor low density created conditions for faster growth. During 1999, transformers were, on average, shorter and younger in Lewis Creek (131 mm; 100% age 4) than in the Pike River–Morpion Stream (143 mm; 100% age 5). During 2000, the majority (75%) of transformers were age 5 in all streams. Weights of age‐4 transformers in Lewis Creek (1999 and 2000) and the Pike River (2000) were higher than those of age‐4 ammocoetes in those streams. Our results suggest that the first year‐class to become reestablished after lampricide application may transform at a younger age and smaller size than fish of the same age‐class in an untreated stream. Treatment intervals must adapt to changes in age at transformation to prevent transformers from leaving Lake Champlain and Great Lakes tributaries.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.889
Threshold uncertainty score0.221

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.206
Teacher spread0.195 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTransactions of the American Fisheries SocietySame topicFish Ecology and Management StudiesFrench-language works237,207