MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2037361125 · doi:10.1007/s11746-013-2377-y

Optimization of Lipase‐Catalyzed Interesterification of Flaxseed Oil and Tricaprylin Using Response Surface Methodology

2013· article· en· W2037361125 on OpenAlexafffund
Maryam Khodadadi, Sélim Kermasha

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the American Oil Chemists Society · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicEnzyme Catalysis and Immobilization
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsCaprylic acidResponse surface methodologyChemistryLipaseInteresterified fatOleic acidLinoleic acidSunflower oilYield (engineering)BioconversionCentral composite designChromatographyFatty acidEnzymeFood scienceOrganic chemistryBiochemistryMaterials science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The biosynthesis of structured lipids (SL) in organic solvent media was carried out by the interesterification of flaxseed oil (FO) and tricaprylin (TC), using Novozym 435. The bioconversion yield (BY, %) of medium‐long‐medium type SL, including C‐caprylic and Ln‐linolenic acids (CLnC), La‐linoleic acid (CLaC) and O‐oleic acid (COC), was monitored. Response surface methodology was used to obtain significant models for the responses, on the basis of a five level, five variable central composite rotatable design. In the experimental preliminary trials significant reaction parameters, including reaction temperature ( T r ), TC/FO molar ratio ( M r ), enzyme concentration ( E c ), reaction time ( R t ) and initial water activity ( a w ), were considered for optimization. Significant models for CLnC, CLaC and COC were determined after regression analysis with backward elimination. The optimal conditions, generated for a maximum CLnC, CLaC and COC, were found to be 54.50–56.25 °C for T r , 6.23–6.25 mol/mol for M r , 2.68–3.13 % for E c , 36.58–37.50 h for R t and 0.15–0.33 for a w . Under these optimum conditions, the BY of CLnC, CLaC and COC was predicted to be 32.48–36.67, 3.26–3.38 and 5.79–6.16 %, respectively.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.027
Threshold uncertainty score0.303

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.293
Teacher spread0.265 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2013
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the American Oil Chemists SocietySame topicEnzyme Catalysis and ImmobilizationFrench-language works237,207