MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Projections from the nucleus of the basal optic root and nucleus lentiformis mesencephali to the inferior olive in pigeons (Columba livia)

2000· article· en· W2037389703 on OpenAlexaff
Douglas R. Wylie

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Comparative Neurology · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicHemispheric Asymmetry in Neuroscience
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBiologyNucleusAnatomyBasal (medicine)Neuroscience

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The nucleus of the basal optic root (nBOR) of the accessory optic system (AOS) and the pretectal nucleus lentiformis mesencephali (LM) are involved in the analysis of optic flow and the generation of the optokinetic response. Previous studies have shown that the nBOR projects bilaterally to the medial column (mc) of the inferior olive (IO) and the LM projects to the ipsilateral mc. In the present study the retrograde tracer cholera toxin subunit B was injected into either the caudal or rostral mc. From all injections, retrogradely labeled cells were seen in the ipsilateral pretectum along the border of the medial and lateral subnuclei of the LM. Cells were also seen in bilaterally in the nBOR. On the contralateral side, a discrete group of cells was labeled in the rostral margin of the nBOR. These cells were localized in the dorsal portion of the nBOR proper and some were found in the adjacent nBOR dorsalis. On the ipsilateral side, a diffuse group of cells was seen in the caudal nBOR. Most of these cells were in the nBOR dorsalis and outside the nBOR complex in the area ventralis of Tsai and the reticular formation. From the injections into the caudal mc, a greater proportion of labeled cells was found in the LM, whereas a greater proportion of cells was found in the nBOR from the injections into the rostral mc. This differential projection from LM and nBOR to the caudal and rostral mc is consistent with the optic flow preferences of neurons in the mc, and a similar pattern of connectivity has been found in mammalian species.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.809
Threshold uncertainty score0.542

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.041
GPT teacher head0.300
Teacher spread0.258 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations40
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Comparative NeurologySame topicHemispheric Asymmetry in NeuroscienceFrench-language works237,207