MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2037396314 · doi:10.1515/bmt.2004.009

Analyse der Veränderungen von Wavelet-transformierten elektromyographischen Signalen, wie sie beim Tragen einer Kniebandage entstehen / Analysis of Wavelet Transformed Electromyographic Signals that were Altered by Wearing a Knee Brace

2004· article· de· W2037396314 on OpenAlex
V. von Tscharner, Beat Göpfert, D. Wirz, N. F. Friederich

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueBiomedizinische Technik/Biomedical Engineering · 2004
Typearticle
Languagede
FieldEngineering
TopicMuscle activation and electromyography studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGynecologyPhysicsMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Der Vergleich von diversen Elektromyogrammen stellt eine wesentliche Anforderung an die Datenanalyse dar. Das Ziel der vorliegenden Arbeit ist es, eine Methode mit geringem mathematischem Aufwand vorzustellen, mit der kleine Veränderungen am Bewegungsapparat durch Auswertung des EMG-Signals einfach und mit einer hohen Sensitivität ermittelt und dargestellt werden können. Die Wavelettransformierten Elektromyogramme bilden Intensitätsbilder, die in einem Bildraum als Punkte dargestellt werden können. Die Distanz-analyse der Bildpunkte im Bildraum erlaubt es festzustellen, ob zwei Gruppen von Elektromyogrammen – im vorliegenden Falle diejenigen, die beim Gehen mit und ohne Kniebandage gemessen wurden – sich im Mittel signifikant unterscheiden. Die Methode definiert eine Distanz-Winkel-Darstellung und Differenz-Intensitätsbilder, die es erlauben, die Auftrennung optisch zu beurteilen. Es ist zu erwarten, daβ bei gröβeren Interventionen die Unterschiede deutlicher erscheinen werden. The comparison of electromyograms represents a challenge for data analysis. The aim of the project was to present a method that uses a minimal computational effort to resolve small but significant changes in the muscular activity that occur while walking with and without a knee brace. The wavelet transformed electromyograms were represented as intensity patterns that resolve the power of the signal in time and frequency. The intensity pattern of each electromyogram defines single points in a pattern space. The distance between these points in pattern space were used to detect and show the separation between the groups of electromyograms that were recorded while walking with and without a knee brace. The method proposes a distance versus angle representation to visually discriminate the intensity patterns. Once it has been shown that the differences are statistically significant, one can visualize the result in a difference intensity pattern that indicates at what time and at what frequency the electromyograms vary between the two conditions tested. It is to be expected that interventions that are more intrusive than a knee brace will reveal even more distinct differences.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.373
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0040.003
Bibliometrics0.0090.014
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.218
Teacher spread0.208 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it