Changes in Anthropometric Values of Paired Craniofacial Measurements of Patients With Right Coronal Synostosis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Quantitative changes of the 5 paired (right and left) projective linear measurements of the craniofacial complex were analyzed by anthropometric methods in 26 patients (9 males and 17 females) with right coronal synostosis, 16 in infancy (0-5 and 6-12 months) and 10 in early childhood (1-10 years). Measurements were taken from 3 regions: the supraorbital rim length of the head (t-g), the length (en-ex) and height (ps-pi) of the eye fissures in orbits, and the width (pra-pa) and length (sa-sba) of the ears. None of the patients had undergone corrective surgery.Anthropometric analysis of patients in infancy showed a large percentage of subnormal supraorbital rim lengths (t-g) on the right side of the head, with a higher frequency in females (90.9%) than in males (80.0%). Eye fissure lengths (en-ex) were subnormal more often in males than in females on both sides, while heights were generally normal bilaterally in both sexes (72.7-100% of cases). Ears of normal width (pra-pa) and length (sa-sba) were more frequent in females. In males, the frequency of subnormal ear widths and lengths surpassed those in females. The most remarkable changes between infancy and early childhood were noted in the orbital region, in which subnormal eye fissure lengths became bilaterally normal in both sexes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".