Combined use of photosynthetic enzyme complexes and microalgal photosynthetic systems for rapid screening of wastewater toxicity
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Because of the often episodic nature of wastewater toxicity, routine monitoring using expensive and time consuming tests can constitute an inefficient means of toxicity evaluation, particularly when negative results are generated. Cost-effective screening tests enabling the rapid detection of effluent toxicity are clearly needed, and they should be used to rapidly determine where in-depth investigations should be focused. The LuminoTox is a recently-developed screening test enabling the rapid determination of wastewater toxicity. This test is based on the inhibition of chlorophyll fluorescence emitted by photosynthetic systems. The combined use of photosynthetic enzyme complexes (PECs), isolated from higher plants, and whole photosynthetic organisms (algae) allows a wide range of toxic inhibitors to be detected within 10-15 min. The detection thresholds obtained for individual toxic chemicals indicate that algae are less sensitive to metal cations than PECs, because of the algal cell wall being ion selective. However, other toxic chemicals, such as phenolic compounds and nitrogen ammonia, acting on the last constituents of the photosynthetic enzyme complex that are degraded during the PEC extraction process, are more easily detected with algae after just 10 min of exposure. The combination of PECs and algae is not only useful for rapid toxicity screening, but yields results that are as sensitive as those of standard bioassays. Toxicity data generated with mining industry effluents demonstrate that PECs routinely prove to be as sensitive as daphnia, while algal sensitivity is comparable to that of the standard trout bioassay. An important feature of LuminoTox and algal photosynthetic system testing, however, resides in the production of their rapid and sensitive responses (10-15 min) in comparison with those of the more traditional tests (48-96 h for daphnia and trout, respectively).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".