Normocalcemic hyperparathyroidism in patients with recurrent kidney stones: a disease entity or vitamin D deficiency?
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This retrospective data analysis was undertaken to examine the biochemical differences between renal stone formers with normocalcemic hyperparathyroidism (NHPT) and those with normal parathyroid hormone (PTH) levels. Our goal was to ascertain whether 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25(OH)D) status related to PTH levels in this patient cohort. Our findings among 74 patients with NHPT indicate that stone formers with NHPT had significantly lower 25(OH)D levels compared to 192 controls (p = 0.0001) and that 25(OH)D is positively correlated with 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D values (R = 0.736, p = 0.015). Sequential measurements (after 3 - 5 years), among 11 patients with NHPT who did not receive vitamin D (VitD) preparations, showed a significant increase in urinary calcium (3.43 ± 1.96 vs. 5.72 ± 3.95, p = 0.0426) without a significant change in PTH levels. VitD supplementation, to 3 patients resulted in significant PTH decrease (11.8 ± 1.8 vs. 9.8 ± 1.3, p = 0.003). Prospective studies are needed to confirm the role of vitamin supplementation in renal stone formers with NHPT.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it