Lung transplantation complicated by graft‐versus‐host disease and confounded by incidental transfusion‐associated macrochimerism
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Passenger lymphocyte-mediated graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) in solid organ transplantation (SOT-GVHD) is considered a rare complication, particularly among recipients of lung allografts. The risk of transfusion-associated GVHD (TA-GVHD) in solid organ transplants is also considered rare. The suspicion of either may be heralded by signs and symptoms of GVHD in the company of a population of passenger lymphocytes in excess of 1 percent (microchimerism). This case report illustrates the challenge of a patient who presented with macrochimerism both from the lung transplant allograft and from transfusions. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Chimerism assessments of the pre- and posttransplant donor lung, and the recipient's aplastic marrow, were made using DNA-based polymerase chain reaction testing. RESULTS: Macrochimerism was observed in both the posttransplant aplastic host marrow and the engrafted donor lung, with the former predominantly consisting of lung donor lymphocytes and the latter a mixture of lung and presumably transfusion source donor lymphocytes. The pretransplant donor lung exhibited no GVHD-like pathology. CONCLUSION: This case demonstrates SOT-GVHD, with the unusual feature of concomitant macrochimerism from transfusions. SOT-GVHD likely predisposed this patient to the observed transfusion-associated macrochimerism. However, the dissociation between transfusion-attributable macrochimerism and attributable pathology is intriguing. Furthermore, the risk spectrum of transfusion-associated macrochimerism and TA-GVHD in solid organ transplant recipients with and without the complication of SOT-GVHD is unknown and warrants further study.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".