Insulin sensitivity is mediated by the activation of the ACh/NO/cGMP pathway in rat liver
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The hepatic parasympathetic nerves and hepatic nitric oxide synthase (NOS) are involved in the secretion of a hepatic insulin sensitizing substance (HISS), which mediates peripheral insulin sensitivity. We tested whether binding of ACh to hepatic muscarinic receptors is an upstream event to the synthesis of nitric oxide (NO), which, along with the activation of hepatic guanylate cyclase (GC), permits HISS release. Male Wistar rats (8-9 wk) were anesthetized with pentobarbital sodium (65 mg/kg). Insulin sensitivity was assessed using a euglycemic clamp [the rapid insulin sensitivity test (RIST)]. HISS inhibition was induced by antagonism of muscarinic receptors (atropine, 3 mg/kg i.v.) or by blockade of NOS [NG-nitro-L-arginine methyl ester (L-NAME), 1 mg/kg intraportally (i.p.v.)]. After the blockade, HISS action was tentatively restored using a NOdonor [3-morpholynosydnonimine (SIN-1), 5-10 mg/kg i.p.v.] or ACh (2.5-5 microg.kg(-1).min(-1) .i.p.v.). SIN-1 (10 mg/kg) reversed the inhibition caused by atropine (RIST postatropine 137.7 +/- 8.3 mg glucose/kg; reversed to 288.3 +/- 15.5 mg glucose/kg, n = 6) and by L-NAME (RIST post-L-NAME 152.2 +/- 21.3 mg glucose/kg; reversed to 321.7 +/- 44.7 mg glucose/kg, n = 5). ACh did not reverse HISS inhibition induced by L-NAME. The role of GC in HISS release was assessed using 1H-[1,2,4]oxadiazolo[4,3-a]quinoxalin-1-one (ODQ, 5 nmol/kg i.p.v.), a GC inhibitor that decreased HISS action (control RIST 237.6 +/- 18.6 mg glucose/kg; RIST post-ODQ 111.7 +/- 6.2 mg glucose/kg, n = 5). We propose that hepatic parasympathetic nerves release ACh, leading to hepatic NO synthesis, which activates GC, triggering HISS action.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".