A Family of Two Patients with Congenital Lipoid Adrenal Hyperplasia Due to StAR Mutation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We are reporting the case of two sisters born to nonrelated French Canadian parents. Patient A is of female phenotype with 46,xy, and patient B with 46,xx. The children had severe manifestations of mineralocorticoid deficiency at the age of 11 and 4.5 months, respectively. Residual cortisol secretion seemed present until the age of 3 years for patient A and until 15 months in the case of her sister. Both patients responded to glucocorticoid and Florinef treatment. Patient A did not show any androgen secretion and gonadectomy was performed at the age of 13.4 years; estrogen therapy was started at the age of 14 years resulting in a good breast development and an increase of growth velocity. In patient B, a progressive development of secondary sex characters occurred at 11.6 years of age followed at 14 years by menarche associated with a normal secretion of LH, FSH and estradiol; regular menstruations continued up to her last visit at the age of 25 years. We identified a homozygous L275P mutation on the StAR gene of both patients and a heterozygous L275P mutation on that of their mother and father. In transfection analysis in COS-1 cells, the mutant L275P was well-expressed, but its StAR activity was 87% impaired. The remaining activity of the L275P StAR mutant is consistent with the moderate severity of clinical onset of manifestations.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".