Evidence of marked glycogen variations in the characteristic Raman signatures of human embryonic stem cells
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Human embryonic stem cells (hESCs) have typical Raman signatures, but specific factors that contribute to variations in these signatures have not been reported to date. Furthermore, variations due to the passaging that is necessary for hESC culture maintenance could potentially distort these signatures. It is therefore important to characterize the impact of these culture manipulations on the Raman spectra to gain a better understanding of the origins and nature of their variations. Here we report on the Raman microspectroscopy of hESCs samples from maintenance cultures, complemented with periodic acid Schiff (PAS, carbohydrates) and 4′‐6‐diamidino‐2‐phenlyindol (DAPI, nuclei) staining. The component predominantly responsible for variations between spectra was spectrally identified as glycogen. Variations in the Raman map of the 480 cm−1 glycogen marker band corresponded with those of a PAS stain of the same sample area. The 785‐nm Raman microspectra of hESC cultures examined daily after passaging showed that the same nonrandom spectral variances occurred at all time points after passaging. The pattern of these variances was identified as being due to glycogen spectral components. Our results help validate the previously observed spectral signatures of hESCs and further delineate and characterize the variations that can be expected in these signatures under normal maintenance culture conditions, and aid distinguishing them from those corresponding to differentiation, thus providing a benchmark for future studies. Copyright © 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".