Effect of Catalysts Supporting on Tandem Polymerization of Ethylene Stock in Synthesis of Ethylene−1-Hexene Copolymer
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Ethylene−1-hexene copolymers were synthesized with a tandem catalysis system consisting of a new trimerization catalyst ( 1 ), bis(2-dodecylsulfanylethyl)amine−CrCl 3, and a copolymerization catalyst ( 2 ), Et(Ind) 2 ZrCl 2 . Catalysts 1 and 2 were supported on silica particles, and the effects of different supporting strategies on trimerization selectivity, 1-hexene incorporation efficiency, and copolymerization activity were studied and compared to the homogeneous system. It was found that the supported 1 trimerized ethylene with a similar selectivity (>99%) but one-quarter of the activity of the homogeneous 1 . The supported 2 gave 40% 1-hexene incorporation efficiency and one-third of the copolymerization activity of the homogeneous 2 . The tandem action of the supported 1 and 2 yielded linear low-density polyethylene (LLDPE) materials that contained only C4 side-chains. The dual supported system had activities at a 10 7 g/(mol Zr h) level, in the same order of the homogeneous counterpart. Adjusting the Cr/Zr ratio yielded various branching densities and, thus, melting temperatures of the resulting polymers. The samples prepared with the supported 2 exhibited broad differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) curves, probably due to multiple active sites.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".