MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2037756000 · doi:10.1117/12.650457

Enhanced angular domain imaging in turbid media using Gaussian line illumination

2006· article· en· W2037756000 on OpenAlexaff
Glenn H. Chapman, Josna Rao, Ted C.-K. Liu, Paulman K. Y. Chan, Fartash Vasefi, Bożena Kamińska, Nick Pfeiffer

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicOptical Coherence Tomography Applications
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOpticsCollimatorScatteringPhysicsImaging phantomDetectorLight scatteringPhotonMultiangle light scatteringMaterials science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Coherence or Time Domain Optical tomography within highly scattering media observes the shortest path photons over the dominant randomly scattered background light. Angular Domain Imaging employs micromachined collimators detecting photons within small angles of aligned laser light sources. These angular filters are micromachined silicon collimator channels 51 microns wide by 10 mm long on 102 micron spacing, giving an acceptance angle of 0.29 degrees at a CMOS detector array. Phantom test objects were observed in scattering media 5 cm thick at effective scattered to ballistic ratios from 1:1 to greater than 1E8:1. Line and space test objects detection limits are set by detector pixel size (5.5 microns) not collimator hole spacing. To maximize the ballistic/quasi-ballistic photons observed, a line of light aligned with the collimator holes increases detectability by reducing the amount of scattered background light. A Cylindrical Spherical Cylindrical beam expander/shrinker creates a 16 mm by 0.35 mm line of light. Best results occur when the scattering medium, collimator and detector are within 3X the Rayleigh Range of the beam's narrow vertical axis, allowing imaging of 51 micron lines/spaces at 3E8:1 scattering ratios. Restricting the light to a 1 mm line extends this to 8E9:1. Carbon coating the SMCA to reduce reflectivity shows that at high scattering levels absorbing walls will reduce background light, improving contrast. ADI has also been shown to work when the illumination is unaligned with the detector. This allows for side illumination with detection of structures at depths of 3mm with a scattering ratio of 1E6:1.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.405
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.222
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations12
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIESame topicOptical Coherence Tomography ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207