Weight Loss and Outcomes in Wait-listed, Medically Managed, and Surgically Treated Patients Enrolled in a Population-based Bariatric Program
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Multidisciplinary bariatric care is increasingly being delivered in Canada within publicly funded regional programs. Demand is high, wait lists are long, and clinical effectiveness is unknown. OBJECTIVE: To examine the "real-world" outcomes associated with a publicly funded, population-based regional bariatric (medical and surgical) program. RESEARCH DESIGN: Prospective observational cohort. SUBJECTS: Five hundred consecutive patients (150 wait-listed, 200 medically treated, 150 surgically treated) from the Edmonton Weight Wise program were enrolled. MEASURES: The primary outcome was weight change (kg). Between-group changes were analyzed using multivariable regression adjusted for age, sex, and baseline weight and "last-observation-carried-forward" was used for missing data. Subjects transitioning between groups (wait-list to medical or medical to surgery) were censored when crossing over. RESULTS: At baseline, mean age was 43.7 ± 9.6 years, mean body mass index was 47.9 ± 8.1 kg/m, and 88% were female. A total of 412 subjects (82%) completed 2-year follow-up and 143 (29%) subjects crossed over to the next treatment phase. Absolute and relative (% of baseline) mean weight reductions were 1.5 ± 8.5 kg (0.9 ± 6.1%) for wait-listed, 4.1 ± 11.6 kg (2.8 ± 8.1%) for medically treated, and 22.0 ± 19.7 kg (16.3 ± 13.5%) for surgically treated (P<0.001) subjects. For surgery, weight reductions were 7.0 ± 9.7 kg (5.8 ± 7.9%) with banding, 21.4 ± 16.0 kg (16.4 ± 11.6%) with sleeve gastrectomy, and 36.6 ± 19.5 kg (26.1 ± 12.2%) with gastric bypass (P<0.001). Rates of hypertension, diabetes, and dyslipidemia decreased to a significantly greater degree with surgery than medical management (P<0.001) and stayed the same or increased in wait-listed subjects. CONCLUSIONS: Population-based bariatric care, particularly bariatric surgery, was clinically effective. Weight and cardiometabolic risk was relatively stable wait-listed patients receiving "usual care."
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".