MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2037842493 · doi:10.3749/canmin.46.5.1333

FROM STRUCTURE TOPOLOGY TO CHEMICAL COMPOSITION. V. TITANIUM SILICATES: THE CRYSTAL CHEMISTRY OF NACARENIOBSITE-(Ce)

2008· article· en· W2037842493 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Elena Sokolova, F. C. Hawthorne

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Canadian Mineralogist · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicCrystal Structures and Properties
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTitaniumChemical compositionCrystal chemistryChemistryCrystal structureComposition (language)Topology (electrical circuits)CrystallographyOrganic chemistryMathematicsArtCombinatorics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The crystal structure of nacareniobsite-(Ce), ideally Na3 Ca3 REE Nb (Si2O7)2 OF3, a 7.468(2), b 5.689(1), c 18.891(4) A, β 101.37(3)°, V 786.9(1) A3, space group P 21/ c , Z = 2, D calc = 3.539 g.cm−3, from Kvanefjeld in the Ilimaussaq alkaline complex, South Greenland, has been solved by direct methods and refined to R 1 = 6.5% on the basis of 1866 unique reflections | F o ≥ 4σ F | collected on a Bruker P 4 diffractometer with a CCD 4K Smart detector and Mo K α radiation from a crystal consisting of an epitactic intergrowth of nacareniobsite-(Ce) domains. An electron-microprobe analysis gave (wt.%): SiO2 28.30, Nb2O5 12.01, TiO2 2.24, Ta2O5 0.33, Ce2O3 10.55, La2O3 4.42, Nd2O3 4.34, Pr2O3 1.12, Sm2O3 0.64, Gd2O3 0.47, Y2O3 0.57, SrO 0.45, CaO 19.79 Na2O 10.07, F 6.15, total 98.86. The empirical formula is Na2.77 (Ca3.01 Sr0.04)Σ 3.05 (Ce0.55 La0.23 Nd0.22 Pr0.06 Sm0.03 Gd0.02 Y0.04)Σ 1.15 (Nb0.77Ti4+0.24Ta0.01)Σ 1.02 (Si2O7)2 (O1.24 F0.76) Σ2.00 F2, Z = 2, calculated on a basis of 18 (O + F) apfu . Nacareniobsite-(Ce) belongs to a group of titanium disilicate minerals containing the TS block, which consists of HOH sheets (H: heteropolyhedral sheet, O: trioctahedral sheet). In the O sheet, there are two octahedrally coordinated sites: the M O(1) site is primarily occupied by Nb with minor Ti4+ and trace Ta, giving ideally 1 Nb apfu , = 2.01 A, and the M O(3) site is occupied by Na, giving 2 Na apfu , = 2.41 A. The [8]-coordinated M O(2) site is occupied by Na with subordinate Ca, = 2.50 A. The MO polyhedra each share six common edges to form a close-packed O sheet. The H sheet consists of (Si2O7) groups and MH and A P polyhedra. In the H sheet, there are two tetrahedrally coordinated sites occupied by Si with a grand distance of 1.625 A. There are two [7]-coordinated sites, MH and A P , occupied by Ca and REE, giving in total (Ca3 REE1.0), = 2.46 and = 2.49 A, respectively. An H sheet is connected to an O sheet through vertices of (SiO4) tetrahedra and MH and A P polyhedra. Within one TS block in nacareniobsite-(Ce), two (Si2O7) groups, one from each H sheet, link to the MO(2) polyhedron of the O sheet, and two H sheets are approximately related by a pseudo-mirror plane, m z. In the structure of nacareniobsite-(Ce), TS blocks repeat along [001] and are connected through common vertices and edges of (SiO4) tetrahedra and MH and A P polyhedra. Nacareniobsite-(Ce) has the same type of linkage of H and O sheets in the TS block as the Ti disilicate minerals of Group I: gotzenite, hainite, seidozerite, grenmarite, mosandrite, rinkite, kochite and rosenbuschite. In the minerals of Group I, (Ti + Nb) equals 1 apfu and occurs in the O sheet of the TS block. Nacareniobsite-(Ce) is the only disilicate mineral with the TS block in which a pentavalent cation, Nb5+, is dominant at one site in the O sheet. The topology of the crystal structure of nacareniobsite-(Ce) is identical to that of mosandrite [ideally Na2 Ca4 REE Ti (Si2O7)2 O2 F3]. Nacareniobsite-(Ce) and mosandrite differ in the cations in the O sheet of the TS block: {[8]Na [6]Na2[6]Nb5+} in nacareniobsite- (Ce) and {[8]Na [6](NaCa) [6]Ti4+} in mosandrite. In nacareniobsite-(Ce), dominance of Nb5+ at the M O(1) site results in partial substitution of Na for Ca at the [6]-coordinated M O(3) site in the O sheet.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.216
Teacher spread0.201 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations36
Published2008
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Canadian MineralogistSame topicCrystal Structures and PropertiesFrench-language works237,207