Astrocytes affect the profile of purines released from cultured cortical neurons
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Adenosine (ADO) is produced by cultured neurons and astrocytes, albeit by different pathways, during in vitro stroke models (Parkinson and Xiong [2004] J. Neurochem. 88:1305-1312). Expression of ecto-5' nucleotidase (e-N), the enzyme responsible for extracellular dephosphorylation of AMP to ADO, is more abundant in astrocytes than neurons. Therefore, we tested the hypothesis that N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) evokes ADO release per se from neurons, whereas dephosphorylation of extracellular adenine nucleotides contributes to NMDA-evoked ADO production in the presence of astrocytes. We used four different cell preparations-cortical rat neurons, cortical rat astrocytes, cocultures of neurons and astrocytes, and transient cocultures of neurons with astrocytes on transwell filters-to show that astrocytes contribute to NMDA-evoked increases in extracellular ADO. NMDA significantly increased ADO and inosine (INO) production from cultured cortical neurons but only increased extracellular INO production from cocultures. In neurons, the equilibrative nucleoside transport (ENT) inhibitor dipyridamole (DPR) prevented NMDA-evoked ADO and INO production, whereas the e-N inhibitor alpha,beta-methylene ADP (AOPCP) had no effect. Conversely, from both cocultures and transient cocultures DPR significantly decreased NMDA-evoked INO but not ADO generation. AOPCP inhibited NMDA-evoked production of both ADO and INO from transient cocultures. In the absence of astrocytes, NMDA evoked release of intracellular ADO and INO from cultured cortical neurons through ENT. However, in the presence of astrocytes, extracellular conversion of adenine nucleotides to ADO contributed significantly to NMDA-evoked production of this purine.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".