Preclinical experiment of auxiliary partial orthotopic liver transplantation as a curative treatment for hemophilia
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The cause of hemophilia is deficiency of coagulation factor VIII production in the liver, which can be cured by liver transplantation. Because the hepatic function of hemophilia patients is quite normal except for production of factor VIII, auxiliary partial orthotopic liver transplantation (APOLT) is beneficial in that patient survival is secured by preserving native liver even in the event of graft loss. However, it is not known whether the graft of APOLT would be enough to cure hemophilia. We evaluated the efficacy and feasibility of APOLT for hemophilia in a canine hemophilia A model that we established. Partial left liver graft was taken from the normal donor (blood factor VIII activity > 60%). The graft was transplanted to the hemophilia beagle dog (blood factor VIII activity < 5%) after resection of the left lobe preserving native right lobe. Changes in time of blood factor VIII activity and liver function parameters were observed after APOLT. APOLT and perioperative hemostatic management were successfully performed. The blood factor VIII activity increased to 30% after APOLT, and was sustained at least 6 weeks throughout the observation period without symptoms of bleeding. The result demonstrated sustained production of factor VIII in the hemophilia recipient after APOLT. Transplantation of approximately one third of whole liver resulted in cure of hemophilia. In conclusion, it is suggested that APOLT would be feasible as a curative treatment of hemophilia A to improve quality of life of the patients.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".