Myofibroblastoma: Report of a Rare Entity in the Pediatric Population
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Fibroblastic and myofibroblastic tumors constitute an important group of neoplasms in children and adolescents. These span the full spectrum of clinical behavior, ranging from benign to intermediate and malignant. We report a case of a benign mesenchymal tumor with myofibroblastic differentiation in a 9-year-old girl arising in the left groin that met the histologic features described for myofibroblastoma in adults. Two types are recognized in adults: angiomyofibroblastoma and mammary-type myofibroblastoma of soft tissue. Our case shared features of both these subtypes but was not typical of either one, and we therefore designated our case simply as "myofibroblastoma." Our case showed expression of estrogen receptor protein, which is characteristic of adult lesions, but not a deletion of 13q14, as has been reported in some adult cases. In the English-language literature, only 6 cases have been reported in patients under 21 years of age, and all but 1 were teenagers. Pediatric surgeons, oncologists, and pathologists should be aware that such a benign entity can occur in this patient population and could be confused with other lesions, including malignant ones.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".