C‐terminal loop of <i>Streptomyces</i> phospholipase D has multiple functional roles
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We have recently shown that two flexible loops of Streptomyces phospholipase D (PLD) affect the catalytic reaction of the enzyme by a comparative study of chimeric PLDs. Gly188 and Asp191 of PLD from Streptomyces septatus TH-2 (TH-2PLD) were identified as the key amino acid residues involved in the recognition of phospholipids. In the present study, we further investigated the relationship between a C-terminal loop of TH-2PLD and PLD activities to elucidate the reaction mechanism and the recognition of the substrate. By analyzing chimeras and mutants in terms of hydrolytic and transphosphatidylation activities, Ala426 and Lys438 of TH-2PLD were identified as the residues associated with the activities. We found that Gly188 and Asp191 recognized substrate forms, whereas residues Ala426 and Lys438 enhanced transphosphatidylation and hydrolysis activities regardless of the substrate form. By substituting Ala426 and Lys438 with Phe and His, respectively, the mutant showed not only higher activities but also higher thermostability and tolerance against organic solvents. Furthermore, the mutant also improved the selectivity of the transphosphatidylation activity. The residues Ala426 and Lys438 were located in the C-terminal flexible loop of Streptomyces PLD separate from the highly conserved catalytic HxKxxxxD motifs. We demonstrated that this C-terminal loop, which formed the entrance of the active well, has multiple functional roles in Streptomyces PLD.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".