Effect of Sr<sup>2+</sup>association on the tautomerization processes of uracil and its dithio- and diseleno-derivatives
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The structures and relative stabilities of the complexes formed by uracil and its thio- and seleno-derivatives with the Sr(2+) cation, in the gas phase, have been analyzed by means of G96LYP density functional theory (DFT) calculations. The attachment of the Sr(2+) cation to the heteroatom at position 4 is preferred systematically. Although the enolic forms of uracil and its derivatives should not be observed in the gas phase, the corresponding Sr(2+) complexes are the most stable. The enhanced stability of these tautomers is two-fold, on the one hand Sr(2+) interacts with two basic sites simultaneously, and on the other hand an aromatization of the six-membered ring takes place upon Sr(2+) association. Sr(2+) attachment also has a clear catalytic effect in the tautomerization processes involving uracil and its derivatives. This catalytic effect increases when oxygen is replaced by sulfur or selenium. The Sr(2+) binding energy with uracil and its derivatives is bigger than the tautomerization barriers connecting the dioxo forms with the corresponding enolic tautomers. Consequently, when associated with Sr(2+), all tautomers are energetically accessible and should all be observed in the gas phase.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".