MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2038036962 · doi:10.1002/humu.1205

Low density lipoprotein receptor (LDLR) gene mutations in Canadian subjects with familial hypercholesterolemia, but not of French descent

2001· article· en· W2038036962 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Jian Wang, Erin Huff, Lenny Janecka, Robert A. Hegele

Bibliographic record

VenueHuman Mutation · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicLipoproteins and Cardiovascular Health
Canadian institutionsRobarts Clinical Trials
FundersHeart and Stroke Foundation of Canada
KeywordsLDL receptorFamilial hypercholesterolemiaBiologyGeneticsGeneDescent (aeronautics)MutationLow-density lipoproteinLipoproteinInternal medicineEndocrinologyCholesterolMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) is a relatively common autosomal dominant disorder, which is characterized by elevated plasma concentrations of low density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol and early coronary heart disease. FH results from mutations in the gene encoding the LDL receptor (LDLR). In Canada, there is a founder effect for LDLR mutations in FH among individuals of French descent, most of whom reside in the province of Quebec. However, the spectrum of mutations in other regions, specifically in the populous and predominantly English-speaking province of Ontario, has not been studied. We sequenced the coding regions, promoter and intron-exon boundaries of the LDLR gene in 60 Ontario FH subjects from a variety of ethnic backgrounds other than French Canadian. We found 25 LDLR mutations in 34 subjects. Eleven LDLR mutations were novel, including two in-frame deletions of a single amino acid (one each in exons 2 and 4), two larger deletions that shifted the reading frame (one each in exons 4 and 10), five missense mutations (C42R, A370T, T413M, L561P and E760D) and two splice acceptor mutations (one each in introns 3 and 8). The results indicate that FH is more genetically diverse in Ontario than in Quebec. The results are also consistent with findings from investigations of the LDLR in FH conducted in other countries, in which PCR-based, exon-by-exon sequencing uncovers small mutations in about half of the subjects screened. The gap in molecular diagnosis suggests that lesions not found by this sequencing strategy, such as larger scale LDLR mutations that cannot be amplified, may underlie a substantial number of cases of FH. Alternatively, there might be genetic heterogeneity underlying the FH phenotype, with contributions from other single or multiple genes. Hum Mutat 18:359, 2001.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.540
Threshold uncertainty score0.607

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.251
Teacher spread0.233 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations44
Published2001
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHuman MutationSame topicLipoproteins and Cardiovascular HealthFrench-language works237,207