MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Orthopaedic manifestations of Brachmann???de Lange syndrome: a report of 34 patients

2004· article· en· W2038041906 on OpenAlexaff
Andreas Roposch, Atul Bhaskar, Francis Lee, S Adedapo, Maryline Mousny, Benjamin A. Alman

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Pediatric Orthopaedics B · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicConnective tissue disorders research
Canadian institutionsSickKids FoundationHospital for Sick ChildrenUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicinePediatricsSurgeryElbow

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Brachmann-de Lange syndrome (BDLS) is a disorder of unknown cause that is recognized on the basis of characteristic facies in association with growth retardation, mental retardation and, in many cases, upper limb anomalies. Because of its association with skeletal anomalies, patients with the syndrome are often referred to the paediatric orthopaedic surgeon. Thirty-four patients with Brachmann-de Lange syndrome were evaluated for the prevalence and pattern of musculoskeletal involvement. The average age of the patients was 10.2 years (range, 1 month to 44 years). Both sexes were affected equally. The common orthopaedic manifestation affected the hand (100%), elbow (47%), and the heel cord (26%). Severe bony anomalies included complete absence of the hand in one case, and ulna hemimelia in two cases. In two patients bilateral Legg-Perthes-like changes were noted. Scoliosis presented in four cases, all before the age of 10 years. Surgery was performed in two patients with severe bilateral equinovarus feet. Despite the constellation of musculoskeletal findings, most of the patients did not have surgical intervention for their deformities.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.280
Teacher spread0.270 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations24
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Pediatric Orthopaedics BSame topicConnective tissue disorders researchFrench-language works237,207