MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

EFFECTS OF AN AQUATIC EXERCISE PROGRAM ON PHYSICAL PERFORMANCE OF OLDER FEMALES WITH ARTHRITIS

2001· article· en· W2038154650 on OpenAlexaff
M. Alexander, Janice Butcher

Bibliographic record

VenueMedicine & Science in Sports & Exercise · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicLower Extremity Biomechanics and Pathologies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicinePhysical therapyAnalysis of varianceBalance (ability)Grip strengthRepeated measures designStatistical significanceArthritisFlexibility (engineering)Dynamic balancePhysical medicine and rehabilitationMathematicsInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The purpose of this study was to examine the effects of a 12-week water exercise program on several physical performance variables of older females with arthritis, compared with non-exercising controls. The arthritis group consisted of nineteen older females (age = 64.8 yr.) recruited for a pool arthritis exercise program, while the control group consisted of nine (age = 60.8) non-exercising females with arthritis. Pretest data for each of these subjects was collected prior to participation in the arthritis exercise program and consisted of: age, height, weight, sit and reach, side bend flexibility, shoulder rotation flexibility, arm curls, grip strength, one foot balance, sit to stand and walk, and six minute walk. A one-way ANOVA was used to compare mean pretest and posttest measurements between the two groups, and a significance level of p < .05 was used. A repeated measures ANOVA was used to determine the significance of the differences between pretest and posttest scores for each group. In comparing the pretest scores, there was no difference in age or height, while weight and BMI were substantially greater in the exercise group. The exercise group had significantly poorer sit to stand and walk scores, and somewhat lower scores on the one foot balance. There were no differences in the remainder of the initial performance scores between the two groups. Comparison of the pretest and posttest scores indicated that grip strength, number of arm curls, and one foot balance improved significantly in the exercise group, while there were no corresponding improvements in the performance of the control group. In conclusion, there were improvements in several aspects of the physical performance of arthritic subjects following a 12-week exercise program, suggesting that strength and balance were specifically improved. Other performance variables related to cardiovascular fitness and flexibility were not found to improve following 12 weeks of this program.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Non-randomized trial · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.245
Teacher spread0.236 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNon-randomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMedicine & Science in Sports & ExerciseSame topicLower Extremity Biomechanics and PathologiesFrench-language works237,207