MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2038157045 · doi:10.1051/forest:2003053

Structure, spatial distribution and competition in mixed jack pine (<i>Pinus</i> <i>banksiana</i>) stands on clay soils of eastern Canada

2003· article· en· W2038157045 on OpenAlexafffundabout
M.M. Bland, Jean-Martin Lussier, Yves Bergeron, Marie-H�l�ne Longpr�, M. Bland

Bibliographic record

VenueAnnals of Forest Science · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicForest ecology and management
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec en Abitibi-TémiscamingueUniversité du Québec à MontréalCanadian Forest ServiceNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaUniversité de MonctonUniversité du Québec à Montréal
KeywordsSoil waterPinus <genus>Spatial distributionCompetition (biology)ForestryPlant ecologyWoody plantEcologyClay soilEnvironmental scienceSoil scienceGeographyBotanyBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The dynamics of pure jack pine (Pinus banksiana) stands and of those also comprising a component of white birch (Betula papyrifera) and trembling aspen (Populus tremuloides) was assessed in natural post-fire stands on clay soils of eastern Canada boreal mixed woods in order to shed some light on mechanisms controlling composition.Age structures indicated that the presence of birch or aspen merely shortened the establishment of jack pine.Basal area structures of jack pine showed lower skewness coefficients in mixtures with birch than in pure jack pine stands or when mixed with aspen indicating that birch is probably a weaker competitor.Its effect on mean pine diameter probably reflects the lower pine stem density when mixed with birch.Inter-specific competition however had no effect on pine diameter at the tree level.Competition between birch, aspen and pine is avoided by species spatial exclusion measured by Ripley's statistic and reflects the reproductive strategies of the species and history of the site. Ripley's K / asymmetric competition / interspecific competition / composition / stand structureRésumé -Structure, distribution spatiale et compétition dans les peuplements mélangés et purs de pin gris (Pinus banksiana) sur argile dans l'est canadien.Nous avons étudié la dynamique des peuplements de pin gris purs (Pinus banksiana) et mélangés au bouleau à papier (Betula papyrifera) et au peuplier faux-tremble (Populus tremuloides), établis naturellement après un incendie sur sol argileux en forêt boréale mixte de l'est canadien dans le but de mieux comprendre ce qui contrôle leur composition.Les structures d'âge indiquent peu de différence dans le délai d'établissement du pin gris selon la composition.Les surfaces terrières des pins gris montrent de plus faibles coefficients d'asymétrie en mélange avec le bouleau qu'avec le peuplier, ce qui laisse à penser que le bouleau est un plus faible compétiteur.L'effet du bouleau sur le diamètre moyen du pin reflète la plus faible densité du pin en peuplements mélangés à du bouleau.La compétition interspécifique n'a cependant pas affecté le diamètre du pin à l'échelle de l'arbre.La compétition interspécifique est évitée par l'exclusion spatiale des espèces mise en évidence par la statistique de Ripley, ce qui reflète leur stratégies reproductives et l'historique du site. statistique K de Ripley / compétition asymétrique / compétition interspécifique / composition / structure des peuplements

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.133
Threshold uncertainty score0.268

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.227
Teacher spread0.216 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations28
Published2003
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAnnals of Forest ScienceSame topicForest ecology and managementFrench-language works237,207