MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2038162241 · doi:10.1109/tpwrd.2010.2080323

A Method to Construct Equivalent Circuit Model From Frequency Responses With Guaranteed Passivity

2010· article· en· W2038162241 on OpenAlexaff
Iraj Rahimi Pordanjani, C. Y. Chung, Hooman Erfanian Mazin, Wilsun Xu

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Power Delivery · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicLightning and Electromagnetic Phenomena
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPassivityEquivalent circuitFrequency domainControl theory (sociology)Dimension (graph theory)Frequency responseElectronic circuitComputer scienceNetwork analysisElectrical elementElectronic engineeringEngineeringMathematicsVoltageElectrical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Converting the frequency response of a network into an equivalent time-domain circuit is a common task in several fields, such as power system simulations. A few good methods, such as the vector fitting method, have been proposed to do the conversion. Unfortunately, these methods sometimes produce non-passive equivalent circuits which are hard to realize in time domain or can lead to unstable simulations. In order to address the concern, this paper proposes a new conversion method for single-input single-output systems with guaranteed passivity for the resulting circuit. The basic idea of the proposed method is to represent the equivalent circuit as a matrix with varying dimension and unknown values. Genetic algorithm is then applied to find the values and dimension by minimizing the errors between the desired frequency response and that produced by the equivalent circuit. Since the equivalent circuit consists of only passive elements, the circuit passivity is always guaranteed. Details of the problem formulation and the solution algorithms are presented in this paper. Performance of the proposed method has been confirmed by several case studies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.476
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.244
Teacher spread0.232 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations27
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Power DeliverySame topicLightning and Electromagnetic PhenomenaFrench-language works237,207