MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2038235671 · doi:10.2118/155937-ms

LWD Azimuthal Laterolog Resistivity Logging in Unconventional Reservoirs

2012· article· en· W2038235671 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Paul Sinclair, Li Anzong, Aaron Otteman, Alisha Wennekamp

Bibliographic record

VenueIADC/SPE Asia Pacific Drilling Technology Conference and Exhibition · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeophysical and Geoelectrical Methods
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeologyBoreholeOil shalePetroleum engineeringDrillingElectrical resistivity and conductivityAzimuthDirectional drillingWell loggingCarbonateFormation evaluationPetrologyGeotechnical engineeringEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The development of unconventional oil and gas resources is critically dependent on accurate geosteering of horizontal wells. A new type of LWD Azimuthal Laterolog Resistivity logging tool has been introduced that is specifically designed for geosteering and formation evaluation in complex carbonates, shale-gas, shale-oil, and coal-bed methane formations. The new tool is able to detect approach to a distant parallel bed-boundary of contrasting resistivity that is either higher or lower than the borehole environment. This enables predictive geosteering if the tool is not installed too far from the drill-bit. Conventional wave-propagation tools respond mainly to nearby conductive anomalies, which can limit their application in geosteering shale-oil wells where the target formation is often lower resistivity than those on upper or lower boundaries, or when the borehole traverses a fault and the target formation is higher resistivity and located in an unknown direction. Laterolog types of tools are capable of accurate measurement over a wide range of resistivity from 0.2 – 20,000 ohm.meters, enabling hydrocarbon saturation calculation even in tight carbonate formations. Many carbonate formations, and most coal seams, produce from natural fractures or vugs. The new tool has thin-bed resolution of 0.14 meters, enabling it to image the more productive zones for real-time production analysis while drilling, with significant potential cost-savings. The GRT tool has been commercial for two years, accumulating several thousands of hours of drilling time in operations provided by several independent MWD service companies. Successful geosteering jobs have been completed in the Montney, Bakken, Viking (Canada), Niobrara, and Avalon (USA) unconventional formations. The first test in China was in Talimu Oilfield, where the new tool was able to reproduce logs from a wireline Dual Laterolog in resistivities ranging from 20,000 – 100,000 ohm.meters. Tests have also been run in Tuha and Changqing (Sulige) oil and gas fields. A description of the tool operating theory, design objectives, unique real-time geosteering display, and logging software is presented. Some results from three years of operations in North America and China will be discussed along with logs and brief case studies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.248
Teacher spread0.223 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIADC/SPE Asia Pacific Drilling Technology Conference and ExhibitionSame topicGeophysical and Geoelectrical MethodsFrench-language works237,207