A critical role for IL‐15 in TLR‐mediated innate antiviral immunity against genital HSV‐2 infection
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Innate antiviral immunity, particularly at mucosal surfaces, has a critical role in early control of viral infections. Both type I interferons (IFNs) and interleukin-15 (IL-15) are essential components of innate antiviral immunity. It has been shown that toll-like receptor (TLR) ligand-induced innate antiviral immunity requires IFN-α/β and -λ receptor signaling. However, it is not known if IL-15 has a role in TLR ligand-mediated antiviral responses. Here, we report that ligands for TLR-3 and TLR-9 cannot confer protection against genital herpes simplex virus-2 (HSV-2) in the absence of IL-15 in vivo. Interestingly, wild-type mice depleted of natural killer (NK) cells and treated with TLR ligands are protected upon HSV-2 challenge, suggesting that the critical role of IL-15 is independent of NK cell-mediated activity. To examine the cytokine response in the absence of IL-15, we investigated TLR ligand-induced IFN-β and -λ production in the vaginal washes, but found no impairment in IL-15(-/-) mice. Finally, we report no impairment in the expression of the IFN-stimulated genes in IL-15(-/-) mice. Collectively, the data suggest that TLR ligands induce an IFN-mediated response in the vaginal tract of both wild-type and IL-15(-/-) mice, but its induction is insufficient for providing protection against HSV-2 in the absence of IL-15.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".