Helix 4 Mutants of the <i>Bacillus thuringiensis</i> Insecticidal Toxin Cry1Aa Display Altered Pore-Forming Abilities
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The role played by alpha-helix 4 of the Bacillus thuringiensis toxin Cry1Aa in pore formation was investigated by individually replacing each of its charged residues with either a neutral or an oppositely charged amino acid by using site-directed mutagenesis. The majority of the resulting mutant proteins were considerably less toxic to Manduca sexta larvae than Cry1Aa. Most mutants also had a considerably reduced ability to form pores in midgut brush border membrane vesicles isolated from this insect, with the notable exception of those with alterations at amino acid position 127 (R127N and R127E), located near the N-terminal end of the helix. Introducing a negatively charged amino acid near the C-terminal end of the helix (T142D and T143D), a region normally devoid of charged residues, completely abolished pore formation. For each mutant that retained detectable pore-forming activity, reduced membrane permeability to KCl was accompanied by an approximately equivalent reduction in permeability to N-methyl-D-glucamine hydrochloride, potassium gluconate, sucrose, and raffinose and by a reduced rate of pore formation. These results indicate that the main effect of the mutations was to decrease the toxin's ability to form pores. They provide further evidence that alpha-helix 4 plays a crucial role in the mechanism of pore formation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".