The role of semiochemicals in host location and non-host avoidance by salmon louse (<i>Lepeophtheirus salmonis</i>) copepodids
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The role and identity of host and non-host chemical cues (semiochemicals) in host location and non-host avoidance for copepodid larvae of sea lice, Lepeophtheirus salmonis, was investigated using Y-tube behavioural bioassays, solid-phase extraction (SPE), and coupled gas chromatography mass spectrometry (GCMS). Using artificial seawater conditioned with the preferred salmonid host, Salmo salar, L. salmonis displayed high activation and directional responses in Y-tube assays to salmon-conditioned water (SCW), to an extract of SCW prepared by SPE, and to a vacuum distillate of the SPE extract. Similar responses were observed to two chemicals identified from SCW by coupled GCMS: isophorone and 6-methyl-5-hepten-2-one. Dose-response studies with isophorone showed that copepodid responses across the range tested were maximised at 0.01 and 0.1 mg·mL 1 . A mixture of isophorone and 6-methyl-5-hepten-2-one also induced high activation and directional responses. Semiochemicals were also isolated from the non-host fish, turbot (Scophthalmus maximus (Rafinesque)), by SPE and analysed by GCMS. Two non-host-specific chemicals were identified as 2-aminoacetophenone and 4-methylquinazoline. When SCW was mixed with either of the non-host chemicals, activation and directional responses to SCW were eliminated in the Y tube.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".