Smectic ordering of homogeneous semiflexible polymers
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A self-consistent-field theory for fluids of homogeneous wormlike polymers exhibiting a one-dimensional spatial variation is presented. We have extended the treatment of excluded-volume effects by adding an effective interaction term which describes the excluded volume between wormlike cylindrical segments and terminal (or end) segments of the polymer molecules. This enables us to find a smectic-A phase in the case of homogeneous semiflexible polymers. Using this framework, we have investigated the occurrence of smectic-A, nematic, and isotropic phases in the second-virial (Onsager) approximation. Phase diagrams are calculated for systems characterized by different rigidities (i.e., persistence lengths). For the case of infinitely rigid molecules, the nematic-smectic transition appears to be mostly second order. Systems of semiflexible molecules exhibit mainly a first-order smectic-nematic transition, and their isotropic-nematic-smectic triple points are accessed for different rigidity values. The nematic-smectic transition line is in good agreement with previous analytical calculations, which were also performed assuming the second-virial approximation. However, the values of the volume fraction at the nematic-smectic transition are large compared with computer simulation results, indicating limitations of the second-virial approximation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".