Alamethicin Topology in Phospholipid Membranes by Oriented Solid-state NMR and EPR Spectroscopies: a Comparison
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Alamethicin, a hydrophobic peptide that is considered a paradigm for membrane channel formation, was uniformly labeled with 15N, reconstituted into oriented phosphatidylcholine bilayers at concentrations of 1 or 5 mol %, and investigated by solid-state NMR spectroscopy as a function of temperature. Whereas the peptide adopts a transmembrane alignment in POPC bilayers at all temperatures investigated, it switches from a transmembrane to an in-plane orientation in DPPC membranes when passing the phase transition temperature. This behavior can be explained by an increase in membrane hydrophobic thickness and the resulting hydrophobic mismatch condition. Having established the membrane topology of alamethicin at temperatures above and below the phase transition, ESEEM EPR was used to investigate the water accessibility of alamethicin synthetic analogues carrying the electron spin label TOAC residue at one of positions 1, 8, or 16. Whereas in the transmembrane alignment the labels at positions 8 and 16 are screened from the water phase, this is only the case for the latter position when adopting an orientation parallel to the surface. By comparing the EPR and solid-state NMR data of membrane-associated alamethicin it becomes obvious that the TOAC spin labels and the cryo-temperatures required for EPR spectroscopy have less of an effect on the alamethicin-POPC interactions when compared to DPPC. Finally, at P/L ratios of 1/100, spectral line broadening due to spin-spin interactions and thereby peptide oligomerization within the membrane were detected for transmembrane alamethicin.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".