MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2038411769 · doi:10.1117/12.911527

3D reconstruction of the scapula from biplanar radiographs

2012· article· en· W2038411769 on OpenAlexaff
Pierre-Yves Lagacé, Thierry Cresson, Nicola Hagemeister, Fabien Billuart, Xavier Ohl, Jacques A. de Guise, Wafa Skalli

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicShoulder and Clavicle Injuries
Canadian institutionsÉcole de Technologie Supérieure
Fundersnot available
KeywordsScapulaComputer scienceProjection (relational algebra)Parametric statisticsDeformation (meteorology)RadiographyComputer visionArtificial intelligence3D reconstructionOrientation (vector space)Motion captureIterative reconstructionMathematicsGeometryAlgorithmMotion (physics)AnatomyGeologyMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Access to 3D bone models is critical for applications ranging from pre-operative planning to biomechanics studies. This work presents a method for 3D reconstruction of the scapula from biplanar radiographs, which is based on the combination of a parametric model approach in conjunction with a Moving Least Squares (MLS) deformation technique. A parametric scapula model was created by fitting geometric primitives (with their descriptive parameters) to the CT reconstruction of a dry scapula. These geometric primitives were then used to define a set of handles which allow the user to control the as-rigid-as-possible deformation of the template model in real-time, until optimal correspondence between the actual X-ray images and the retro-projection of the deformed model. When applied to 10 dry scapulae, the presented method allowed obtaining reconstructions which were on average within 1mm of the CT-derived model at scapula regions of interest. Morphological parameters such as the glenoid's dimensions and orientation were determined with errors of 1° and less than 1mm, on average. This is of great interest as the current methods used in clinical practice, which are based on 2D-CT, are subject to uncertainties of the order of 5° for glenoid version. This method is of particular interest as it further reduces our dependence to CT for 3D reconstruction of bones and clinical parameter estimation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.016

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.260
Teacher spread0.249 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIESame topicShoulder and Clavicle InjuriesFrench-language works237,207