Synthesis and Evaluation of Estrogen Agonism of Diaryl 4,5-Dihydroisoxazoles, 3-Hydroxyketones, 3-Methoxyketones, and 1,3-Diketones: A Compound Set Forming a 4D Molecular Library
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this paper, the preparation and systematic evaluation of estrogen receptor alpha (ER alpha) and estrogen receptor beta (ER beta) activities of some diaryl-1,3-diones and their synthetic intermediates, diaryl-4,5-dihydroisoxazoles, diaryl-3-hydroxyketones, diaryl-3-methoxyketones, and diaryl-2-(dimethyl-lambda 4-sulfanylidene)-1,3-diones, is described. The set of 72 compounds constitutes a general schematic structure aryl1-linker1-spacer-linker2-aryl2, where the linker1-spacer-linker2 length varies between 4 and 8 carbons. The set of compounds was applied here to map and explore the active sites of subtypes ER alpha and ER beta. The highest activities were obtained with dihydroisoxazole and hydroxyketone spacers, but even the most flexible diones with unsubstituted aryl groups showed some agonism. Most compounds were found to be ER alpha selective or to activate both receptors, but in some cases we saw also clearly stronger ER beta activation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".