MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2038503908 · doi:10.7202/037301ar

La déshérence du clandestin : les rites de l’interprétation autour de l’essai sur la traduction de Walter Benjamin

2007· article· fr· W2038503908 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueTTR traduction terminologie rédaction · 2007
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicWalter Benjamin Studies Compilation
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhilosophyHumanities

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

La déshérence du clandestin : les rites de l'interprétation autour de l'essai sur la traduction de Walter Benjamin — À partir d'un corpus restreint, bien délimité, d'analyses critiques consacrées à l'essai sur la traduction de Benjamin, cette étude dégage une diversité de points de vue qui, sous leur contradiction apparente, en appellent de la part du lecteur à un processus de traduction continue qui est pour ainsi dire encodée, de façon intrinsèque, dans la poétique même de Benjamin. Loin de se vouloir un cas d'espèce enveloppé dans une aura ésotérique, cette façon de résister à toute forme d5explaining away, indique plutôt que toute théorie de la traduction doit elle-même se « traduire » dans l'élément où elle tente de s'expliquer.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.859
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.056
GPT teacher head0.292
Teacher spread0.236 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it